Despite the recent spat concerning both racism and sexism in the campaigns of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, I read an article this morning that dares to looks beyond those accusations to the ultimate truth. Entitled "Tossing Out the Race Card from the Deck", written by Tom Moran of The Newark, New Jersey, Star Ledger, it illustrates how the issue of race-based politics has evolved over the years. I am very glad we are having this kind of reasoned, rational conversation on this issue instead of the same old pointlessly divisive argument that does little to address the problem and everything to stir up old hatreds.
A year or so ago, I attended a political debate held for local city council elections. The city of Birmingham has for years been comprised of a majority African-American population and as one would expect, most of the candidates themselves were people of color. A woman a only a few years older than me was running for one of the open council seats and I couldn't help but notice a decided difference in how she chose to present her candidacy. By contrast, the candidates of a generation before us trotted out the conventional line of thinking which pits White against Black.
When I pulled her aside privately, we had a chance to speak at length. As she said to me,
You and I are younger. We understand that it isn't about Bull Connor and fire hoses anymore. Times have changed. People have changed.
This has been a long time coming. Only with the arrival of Obama on the political landscape and his viability as an electable candidate have the majority of Americans realized aware that the same politics of racial division are no longer applicable. No one doubts that racism still exists, but it has taken on different permutations than in the past. Economic inequality is arguable the most potent example of contemporary racism and as such, it needs to be addressed in a much more diplomatic, broader context that unites us rather than separates us into factions. As Moran notes, merit, not race, will be the deciding factor in who becomes the Democratic nominee for President in 2008.
Gloria Steinem argued in a column written for The New York Times that, as she put it, "gender is a far more restricting force in American life" than race. I see her point, but the reality is far more complex than that. Discrimination in any form is not always so cut-and-dry. If it were, then we as a society would be better able to address the matter and combat it properly. The problems that face humanity as a whole present challenges that cannot be solved by simple, easy solutions. They are contextually broad and as such resolving them requires the input of everyone, white or black, male or female, rich or poor.
Ignore the Oppression Olympics. Ultimately it matters little whether sexism or racism is a bigger challenge. Electing the best candidate for the job is far more important than superficial banter. We need not get distracted from the true purpose of an election, which is to select the person who can do the best job and be the best steward of our trust. So long as there are people, there will be inequality and oppression.
I disagree with Gloria Steinem's quote to a degree. Women are not as restricted on an educational level to as large a degree as other disadvantaged groups, for example. More women go to college than men.
ReplyDeleteI am not going to vote for Obama but an interesting thing happened. When I thought about Sen Obama I did not think of him as a black man but a presidential candidate, and I thought that that says volumes about our present evolution away from ridiculous bigotry. Personally, I believe we all come from the same place somewhere back in time and it is time to realize we are all in this together, and win lose or draw I am very glad that he has stood up and put himself in this presidential race
ReplyDeleteWe have come a ways from "Bull" Connor and fire hoses", but not that far.
ReplyDeleteWe are, also, a ways from witch burning and June Cleaver, but not that far.
That we see arguments over who has been most put upon, women or blacks, shows how we haven't moved far enough.
And that brings me to my biggest worry about this Presidential election.
Think about the closeness of the past Presidential elections. Now, with that in mind, how many people would never vote for a woman or a black man (or a Clinton)? How many votes can the Democratic party afford to lose?
For that matter, how many votes did Al Gore lose because his running mate, Lieberman, is Jewish? When you see the result from Florida and have seen the antisemitism in Northern Florida, your guess is as good as mine.
I wish it didn't matter, but I am afraid it will.
I don't give a damn which Democrat gets elected, as long as it is a Democrat. I don't care about making statements about the end of racism or the end of sexism, I want it to be about the end of Republicanism, in the Presidency and Supreme Court.
I want the best candidate to emerge so Democrats can win the general election.
Hillary Clinton could change her party, without changing any of her positions, and she'd fit in fine with the Republicans. There is not a corporation nefarious enough for her to refuse their money. Even Rupert Murdoch did a fundraiser for her. She's just another corporate whore. This is not sexism, it is reality.
ReplyDeleteThank you for those who left comments.
ReplyDeleteI agree with all of you. My hope for the election of a Democratic candidate is the continued disunity in the GOP race, a convention fight for the Republicans, and a wholesale refusal of any candidate not a Democrat.
Close elections like the past two have been heartbreakers for all of us and the odds are too high to come out on the losing end of another one.
I still see racism but by the very fact that I have heard only a minority of voices speak up about never wishing to vote for Hillary based on gender or Barack based on race, I think we have come a long, long way.
Ultimately, one never knows until people show up at the voting booth and the result are counted (without hanging chads and voter fraud, of course).